Patent FER Reply
Received a First Examination Report? Respond within the statutory deadline with expert-drafted arguments and amendments
Pricing tailored to your specific requirements — get a free quote.

Service Scope
Fee Breakup
Application Updates
Support
Custom Pricing
Choose Your Plan
Get personalized pricing tailored to your requirements. Our experts will guide you.
FER Analysis & Strategy
Detailed analysis of all objections raised in your FER with a response strategy report and consultation with a patent expert.
- Objection-wise FER Analysis
- Cited Prior Art Review
- Response Strategy Report
- Patent Expert Consultation
Complete FER Response Filing
End-to-end FER response — written arguments for every objection, claim amendments where needed, and filing before the Patent Office.
- Point-wise Written Arguments
- Claim Amendments (Form 13)
- Technical & Legal Submissions
- IPIndia Portal Filing
- Deadline Management
FER Response + Hearing Support
Complete FER response with hearing representation and written submissions if the Controller appoints a hearing after your reply.
- Complete FER Response Filing
- Hearing Attendance
- Written Submissions After Hearing
- End-to-End Prosecution Support
Compare Features
| Feature | FER Analysis & Strategy | Complete FER Response FilingRecommended | FER Response + Hearing Support |
|---|---|---|---|
| Objection-wise FER Analysis | |||
| Cited Prior Art Review | |||
| Response Strategy Report | |||
| Patent Expert Consultation | |||
| Point-wise Written Arguments | |||
| Claim Amendments (Form 13) | |||
| Technical & Legal Submissions | |||
| IPIndia Portal Filing | |||
| Deadline Management | |||
| Complete FER Response Filing | |||
| Hearing Attendance | |||
| Written Submissions After Hearing | |||
| Delivery Time | 5 days | 15 days | 15 days |
Service Overview
About this Service
Overview of Patent FER Reply in India
The First Examination Report (FER) is the most consequential document in Indian patent prosecution. After a Request for Examination (Form 18) is filed, the Controller refers the application to an examiner under Section 12 of the Patents Act, 1970. The examiner searches worldwide prior art, tests the application against every requirement of the Act, and issues the FER — a detailed statement of objections covering novelty, inventive step, patentable subject matter, and formal compliance, along with the prior-art documents (cited as D1, D2, and so on) on which each objection rests.
Receiving an FER is normal — virtually every patent application in India receives one. What decides the fate of the application is the quality of the response. Under Rule 24B of the Patents Rules, the applicant must place the application in order for grant within 6 months from the date of the FER, extendable by up to 3 months by filing Form 4 with the prescribed fee. If no response is filed within this period, the application is deemed abandoned under Section 21(1) — a consequence that is final, with no provision for revival. The priority date, government fees, and years of effort are all lost.
A professionally drafted FER response rebuts each objection with technical and legal argumentation, amends claims where amendment is the smarter strategy, and demonstrates compliance with every formal requirement. Statistically, a large share of examined applications in India are granted directly after a well-drafted FER response without any hearing — while poorly drafted responses push applications into hearings, subsequent examination reports, or refusal under Section 15.
Common Objections Raised in an FER
Lack of Novelty — Section 2(1)(j)
The examiner cites prior-art documents alleging that the invention was already known or published before the filing date. The response must distinguish the invention feature-by-feature from each cited document.
Lack of Inventive Step — Section 2(1)(ja)
The claimed invention is alleged to be obvious to a person skilled in the art in light of the prior art. The response must show a technical advance or economic significance that is not obvious from the citations.
Non-Patentable Subject Matter — Section 3
Objections that the invention is a computer program per se, a business method, a new form of a known substance without enhanced efficacy (3(d)), or otherwise excluded. These require careful legal characterisation of the invention.
Insufficient Disclosure — Section 10
The specification allegedly fails to fully describe the invention or the best method of performing it, or the claims are not clear, succinct, or supported by the description.
Unity of Invention — Section 10(5)
The claims allegedly relate to more than one invention. The remedy may be restricting claims or filing a divisional application under Section 16.
Formal Objections
Defects in forms, missing Form 3 (foreign filing details), inventorship declarations, drawings not as prescribed, or fee shortfalls — every one of these must also be cured in the response.
What a Strong FER Response Contains
- Point-wise written arguments addressing every objection in the FER by its number, leaving nothing unanswered
- Feature-mapping tables distinguishing the claimed invention from each cited prior-art document (D1, D2, …)
- Technical arguments supported by the specification, experimental data, or expert declarations where inventive step is challenged
- Legal submissions on Section 3 exclusions with reference to Patent Office guidelines and judicial precedents
- Amended claims filed on Form 13 where narrowing the claims is the most effective way to overcome prior art — always within the limits of Section 59
- A claim amendment chart showing the basis of every amendment in the specification as originally filed
- Compliance with every formal requirement — updated Form 3, corrected drawings, and any outstanding declarations
Our FER Response Process
- 1FER and file-history review — we study the FER, the cited prior art, and your application documents in detail
- 2Objection analysis — each objection is classified as arguable, curable by amendment, or requiring inventor input
- 3Strategy consultation — we discuss with you (and the inventor) the technical distinctions and agree on the response strategy
- 4Drafting — point-wise arguments, feature-mapping against each citation, and amended claims where needed are drafted by experienced patent professionals
- 5Your review and approval — the complete draft response is shared for your confirmation before filing
- 6Filing and tracking — the response is filed on the IPIndia e-filing portal within the deadline, and we monitor the application for the Controller's next action
Critical Deadlines You Cannot Miss
- 6 months from the date of the FER — statutory period to put the application in order for grant (Rule 24B)
- +3 months maximum extension — available only by filing Form 4 with fees before expiry; no further extension is possible
- Deemed abandonment under Section 21(1) — automatic if the deadline passes without a complete response; the application cannot be revived
- Subsequent Examination Report (SER) or hearing — if objections survive the response, the remaining time is even shorter, so the first response must be as complete as possible
Who Should Opt for This Service?
- Applicants who have just received an FER and face the 6-month statutory clock
- Self-filed inventors who drafted their own application and now face technical objections
- Startups and MSMEs prosecuting their first patent applications
- Foreign applicants prosecuting PCT national-phase applications in India
- Companies with multiple pending applications needing consistent prosecution quality
- Applicants whose earlier response led to a Subsequent Examination Report
Note: Start the FER response process the day you receive the report — quality responses need inventor consultations, prior-art analysis, and careful claim amendments. Approaching a professional in the last weeks of the deadline forces rushed work on the single document that decides whether your patent is granted.

Checklist
Documents You'll Need
Keep these documents handy — our team will guide you through every submission.
Good to know: Accepted formats are PDF, JPG, PNG (max 5MB per file). Please self-attest all identity proofs — our team verifies every document before filing.
Copy of FER
RequiredThe First Examination Report received from the Patent Office
Patent Application Documents
RequiredComplete specification, claims, and drawings as filed
Application Number
RequiredIndian patent application number for status verification
Power of Attorney (Form 26)
RequiredAuthorization for our patent agent to act on your behalf
Technical Clarifications
OptionalInventor's inputs on cited prior art and technical differences
Good to know: Accepted formats are PDF, JPG, PNG (max 5MB per file). Please self-attest all identity proofs — our team verifies every document before filing.
Who It's For
Who Should Opt For This?
Applicants with Pending FER
Patent applicants who have received a First Examination Report and must respond within the statutory deadline.
Startups & Individual Inventors
Self-filed applicants who drafted their own application and now face technical examination objections.
R&D Companies
Organizations with multiple pending applications needing consistent, high-quality prosecution responses.
Foreign Applicants
International applicants prosecuting national-phase PCT applications before the Indian Patent Office.
Universities & Institutions
Academic institutions responding to examination reports on research-based patent filings.
Process
How It Works
A transparent, step-by-step journey from your first call to completed filing.
- 1
FER Review
2-3 daysAnalyze every objection and cited prior-art document.
- 2
Strategy & Inventor Inputs
2-3 daysDiscuss response strategy and technical distinctions with the inventor.
- 3
Drafting Response
5-7 daysDraft point-wise arguments and claim amendments (Form 13) where needed.
- 4
Review & Filing
1-2 daysFinalize with your approval and file on the IPIndia portal.
- 5
Controller's Decision
3-12 monthsGrant, subsequent report, or hearing notice — we track and update you.
Free Expert Consultation
Need Help with Patent FER Reply?
Talk to our senior legal experts for free. Get clarity on documents, eligibility, and the entire process — no charges, no commitment.
Our experts are standing by right now
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know about the service, timelines, and requirements.
Contact our support teamThe FER is the official communication issued by the Indian Patent Office after examining your patent application under Section 12 of the Patents Act, 1970. It lists all objections raised by the examiner — regarding novelty, inventive step, patentable subject matter, and formal requirements — along with cited prior-art documents.
You must place the application in order for grant within 6 months from the date of issuance of the FER. This period can be extended by up to 3 additional months by filing Form 4 with the prescribed fee under the Patents Rules. Missing the deadline results in the application being deemed abandoned under Section 21(1).
If no response is filed within the prescribed period (including any extension), the patent application is treated as abandoned under Section 21(1) of the Patents Act. The application cannot be revived thereafter, and you lose your priority date and all fees paid.
Common objections include lack of novelty (Section 2(1)(j)) based on cited prior art, lack of inventive step (Section 2(1)(ja)), non-patentable subject matter under Section 3 (such as software per se, business methods, or mere admixtures), insufficient disclosure, claim clarity issues, and formal defects in the application documents.
A strong response addresses every objection point-by-point with technical and legal arguments, distinguishes the invention from each cited prior-art document (D1, D2, etc.), files amended claims on Form 13 where amendments help overcome objections, and complies with every formal requirement raised in the report.
Yes. Claims are commonly amended during FER response to overcome prior-art objections. Under Section 59, amendments must be by way of disclaimer, correction, or explanation, and the amended claims must fall within the scope of the original claims — broadening beyond the original disclosure is not permitted.
The Controller reviews the response. If all objections are overcome, the patent proceeds to grant. If some objections remain, the Controller issues a hearing notice under Section 14 giving you an opportunity to be heard before any adverse decision. Roughly half of examined applications are granted directly after the FER response.
Yes, if the response to the FER raises new issues or the examiner is partly satisfied, a Subsequent Examination Report (SER) may be issued. However, the overall 6+3 month timeline from the FER still applies for putting the application in order for grant, so prompt and complete responses are critical.
The applicant can respond directly, but FER responses involve complex claim construction and legal argumentation. A registered patent agent or attorney experienced in prosecution significantly improves the chances of grant — poorly drafted responses often lead to hearings or refusal.
Related Services
Explore More Services
Patent Hearing
Hearing representation and written submissions before the Controller
View ServicePatent Claim Amendment
Form 13 claim and specification amendments by patent experts
View ServicePatent Registration
Professional patent registration services with expert guidance
View ServiceNeed a Custom Solution?
Get in touch for a tailored Patent FER Reply solution designed around your specific requirements.
